• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
phone icon 281-668-9957
Walker & Taylor PLLC
  • AREAS OF PRACTICE
    • Criminal Defense
      • Assault
      • Disorderly Conduct
      • DWI
      • Drug Offense
      • Domestic Violence
      • Murder & Homicide
      • Probation Violation
      • Theft
      • Weapons Charges
    • Civil Defense
    • NFA Gun Trusts
    • LEO Services
    • Expunction / Non-Disclosure
    • Pardons
    • Early Termination
  • TEAM
  • CASE RESULTS
  • GUN LAW RESOURCES
    • Texas Gun Law Overview & FAQs
    • Ask an Attorney
    • Armed Attorneys YouTube
    • Blog
    • Media Appearances
  • GET HELP NOW

Taser That Is Actually a Firearm… Armed Attorneys Explain

JOIN THE MEMBERSHIP: armedattorneys.com/memberships
Survival is step one. We’re step two.

Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes break down a strange legal question coming out of Harris County, Texas: Could the Axon TASER 10 actually qualify as a firearm under Texas law?

A Taser is supposed to be a less-lethal option—but one technical change to the TASER 10 may create a major problem for Texas self-defenders. Because the device uses an electrically initiated primer to propel its probes, the Harris County District Attorney has formally asked the Texas Attorney General whether it falls within the Texas Penal Code definition of a “firearm.”

Why does that matter? If the TASER 10 is legally considered a firearm, does using one suddenly become a use of deadly force? Could someone carrying or possessing one face the same firearm restrictions that apply to an actual handgun? And why does Texas law already define a Taser as a “stun gun” while potentially allowing the TASER 10 to fit both definitions?

Emily and Richard explain the conflict between Texas Penal Code §§ 1.07, 46.01, 38.14, and the newer § 9.55 governing less-lethal force weapons. They also discuss the self-defense consequences: under their analysis, classifying the TASER 10 as a firearm could move its discharge from ordinary force into the much more restrictive deadly-force category.

There was an effort during the 89th Texas Legislature to address this issue. The committee substitute for HB 3669 would have expressly excluded a “stun gun as defined by Section 38.14” from the definition of firearm, but the bill did not ultimately become law. (Texas Legislature Online) Richard Hayes testified in favor of HB 3669 on behalf of Gun Owners of America, and Emily Taylor registered in favor of the bill on behalf of Gun Owners of America–Texas.

Meanwhile, Texas Penal Code § 9.55 now expressly recognizes stun guns and other devices as “less-lethal force weapons”—but that protection specifically applies to peace officers and correctional facility guards performing their official duties. (Texas Legislature Online)

Could Texas end up with one standard for police officers and another for ordinary citizens? And could choosing a less-lethal option actually expose a self-defender to more serious legal consequences?

Watch as Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes explain why this seemingly technical definition could have huge consequences for Texas gun owners and anyone relying on a Taser for self-defense.

SOURCE DOCUMENTS

* Harris County DA Request for Texas Attorney General Opinion — RQ-0657-KP: Texas Attorney General request
* HB 3669 Committee Substitute: Texas Legislature bill text
* HB 3669 Witness List: Texas Legislature witness list

Join the Armed Attorneys Texas Self-Defense Legal Protection Program at ArmedAttorneys.com.

\📌 Get the Armed Attorneys Insider Newsletter!👉 https://mailchi.mp/armedattorneys/insider
⚖️ Need a Texas Criminal Lawyer?Walker & Taylor, PLLC – https://www.walkertaylorlaw.com/
🎯 SUPPORT THE ARMED ATTORNEYS!✔️ Join our YouTube Community: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join✔️ Patreon: https://patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys✔️ Merch Store: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/✔️ Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys✔️ Visit our website: https://armedattorneys.com/

Legal Disclaimers:
📌 General Information OnlyThe material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed as formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. Always consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.

📌 All Rights ReservedThis material is the sole property of Armed Attorneys, LLC. No reproduction is permitted without written permission, except for brief quotations in reviews or critical articles.

Armed Attorneys, LLC is not a law firm and does not directly provide legal representation. Legal services are provided solely by licensed attorneys approved or contracted by Armed Attorneys, LLC.

#Taser #TexasLaw #SelfDefense #ArmedAttorneys #GunLaw #TexasGunLaw #Taser10 #SecondAmendment #DeadlyForce #SelfDefenseLaw

JOIN THE MEMBERSHIP: armedattorneys.com/memberships
Survival is step one. We’re step two.

Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes break down a strange legal question coming out of Harris County, Texas: Could the Axon TASER 10 actually qualify as a firearm under Texas law?

A Taser is supposed to be a less-lethal option—but one technical change to the TASER 10 may create a major problem for Texas self-defenders. Because the device uses an electrically initiated primer to propel its probes, the Harris County District Attorney has formally asked the Texas Attorney General whether it falls within the Texas Penal Code definition of a “firearm.”

Why does that matter? If the TASER 10 is legally considered a firearm, does using one suddenly become a use of deadly force? Could someone carrying or possessing one face the same firearm restrictions that apply to an actual handgun? And why does Texas law already define a Taser as a “stun gun” while potentially allowing the TASER 10 to fit both definitions?

Emily and Richard explain the conflict between Texas Penal Code §§ 1.07, 46.01, 38.14, and the newer § 9.55 governing less-lethal force weapons. They also discuss the self-defense consequences: under their analysis, classifying the TASER 10 as a firearm could move its discharge from ordinary force into the much more restrictive deadly-force category.

There was an effort during the 89th Texas Legislature to address this issue. The committee substitute for HB 3669 would have expressly excluded a “stun gun as defined by Section 38.14” from the definition of firearm, but the bill did not ultimately become law. (Texas Legislature Online) Richard Hayes testified in favor of HB 3669 on behalf of Gun Owners of America, and Emily Taylor registered in favor of the bill on behalf of Gun Owners of America–Texas.

Meanwhile, Texas Penal Code § 9.55 now expressly recognizes stun guns and other devices as “less-lethal force weapons”—but that protection specifically applies to peace officers and correctional facility guards performing their official duties. (Texas Legislature Online)

Could Texas end up with one standard for police officers and another for ordinary citizens? And could choosing a less-lethal option actually expose a self-defender to more serious legal consequences?

Watch as Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes explain why this seemingly technical definition could have huge consequences for Texas gun owners and anyone relying on a Taser for self-defense.

SOURCE DOCUMENTS

* Harris County DA Request for Texas Attorney General Opinion — RQ-0657-KP: Texas Attorney General request
* HB 3669 Committee Substitute: Texas Legislature bill text
* HB 3669 Witness List: Texas Legislature witness list

Join the Armed Attorneys Texas Self-Defense Legal Protection Program at ArmedAttorneys.com.

\📌 Get the Armed Attorneys Insider Newsletter!👉 https://mailchi.mp/armedattorneys/insider
⚖️ Need a Texas Criminal Lawyer?Walker & Taylor, PLLC – https://www.walkertaylorlaw.com/
🎯 SUPPORT THE ARMED ATTORNEYS!✔️ Join our YouTube Community: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join✔️ Patreon: https://patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys✔️ Merch Store: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/✔️ Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys✔️ Visit our website: https://armedattorneys.com/

Legal Disclaimers:
📌 General Information OnlyThe material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed as formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. Always consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.

📌 All Rights ReservedThis material is the sole property of Armed Attorneys, LLC. No reproduction is permitted without written permission, except for brief quotations in reviews or critical articles.

Armed Attorneys, LLC is not a law firm and does not directly provide legal representation. Legal services are provided solely by licensed attorneys approved or contracted by Armed Attorneys, LLC.

#Taser #TexasLaw #SelfDefense #ArmedAttorneys #GunLaw #TexasGunLaw #Taser10 #SecondAmendment #DeadlyForce #SelfDefenseLaw

Category: Armed Attorneys

Sidebar

Have a Legal Question? We Have Answers!

GET HELP NOW

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • December 2017

Categories

  • Armed Attorneys
  • Bump Stock
  • Criminal Defense
  • DUI Attorney
  • Expunction
  • FFL
  • Firm Update
  • Gun Rights
  • Law
  • Law Enforcement
  • NFA Trust
  • Pardons
  • Pistol Brace
  • PLCAA
  • Self-Defense
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Walker & Taylor PLLC

Walker & Taylor, PLLC.

17225 El Camino Real, Suite 310
Houston, TX 77058

281-668-9957

Walker & Taylor, PLLC is located in Houston, TX and serves clients in and around Harris, Galveston, Fort Bend, Montgomery, Liberty, Brazoria, and Chambers Counties.

QUICK LINKS

Home
Gun Law FAQs
Criminal Defense
Team
Blog
Sitemap

CONTACT US

Attorney Advertising: This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

Copyright © 2026 Walker & Taylor, PLLC. Privacy | Terms

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Yelp